High noon for the Garden Bridge as it faces another legal challenge

26 May 2016

 

Legal action in the High Court today took a step nearer over plans to obliterate public open space on which to build the landing for a 366m pedestrian ‘garden bridge’ over the River Thames.   


The legal challenge to the garden bridge has been taken by a Lambeth resident who claims the decision last month by London Borough of Lambeth to vary a lease of the public open space was unlawful. The open space was created as part of the Jubilee Walkway along the River Thames, and was opened by HM Queen in 1988. The variation of the lease by Lambeth Council would enable its obliteration by a 8,500 sq ft building for the bridge landing, including 4,000m2 of commercial space. 


Lawyers for Jenny O’Neill, who lives close to the site on the South Bank in Lambeth, are arguing that Lambeth Council failed to properly consider the loss of the public open space or its status as an Asset of Community Value, a new designation under the Localism Act intended to protect such assets from disposal. They also claim that Lambeth Council acted improperly and ultra vires in seeking to directly gain a “windfall income stream” from the commercial development of open space for which it is a custodian. 


The plans for the Garden Bridge show it spanning the River Thames between Temple tube station on the north bank and the Queen’s Walk on the south bank. Construction on the £175m bridge, which would be managed by the Garden Bridge Trust, was due to start last year but has been delayed by numerous setbacks including a £32m funding gap on construction costs.   
Ms O’Neill, who lives close to the site, has consistently opposed the development, and made both written and oral representations to the planning committees and other meetings with councillors.   


Initially registering 80% approval with the public in 2013, when the details of the Garden Bridge were largely unknown, the most recent and comprehensive poll shows that over 60% of Londoners don’t want the bridge built. The plans are opposed by local residents and councillors, Kate Hoey MP, and representatives from all parties on the GLA. Concerns include the impact on views of St Paul’s, the impact of an estimated 7m visitors on the already busy South Bank, and the use of £60m of public funds from TfL and the Treasury towards the project. 


New Mayor of London Sadiq Khan last week spoke in support of the Garden Bridge, but demanded greater transparency and a reduction in the number of days the privately owned bridge would be closed for corporate and sponsorship events. He also promised not to divert any further public funding towards the project. The previous Mayor Boris Johnson promised to issue a guarantee underwriting the £3.1m maintenance costs, which is a requirement of the planning permission and the Port of London Authority approval. However, the guarantee was never issued by Mr Johnson, and cannot be issued by Mr Khan without potentially diverting millions of pounds of additional public funds. 


Ms O’Neill is a former community education worker, and a member of Thames Central Open Spaces, a group formed to campaign against the Garden Bridge. Ms O’Neill on why she was bringing the case:  

“The impact of the Garden Bridge will be devastating on local residents, on the South Bank, and on London. The best views of the City and St Paul’s will be compromised from Waterloo Bridge and entirely blocked along the South Bank, one of the great promenades of Europe and London’s most popular walking area. With football-match sized crowds blocking the riverwalk, and long queuing times predicted, even Transport for London admit it will become ‘very uncomfortable’ on the South Bank, and could end up dangerous. 


But it is the absolute loss of 30 mature trees a beautiful piece of green open space opened by the Queen that I object most to. Around 800 people live close to the site in social housing, most without gardens. The South Bank and its precious green space is our garden, which we proudly share with Londoners and visitors from around the world. 


We stand to lose our South Bank garden in return for a private bridge with no right of way, closed once or twice a month, and with restricted access. But even this is not guaranteed: with £3.1m annual running costs – four times the cost of maintaining other London bridges – we all may end up picking up the tab.   


I have been particularly aggrieved at the manner in which this proposal has been handled by Lambeth Council, with one councillor taking the decision in private, despite numerous promises that this would be a public decision taken at a public meeting where the public could make clear their opposition. The manner in which Lambeth have sought to avoid its responsibilities towards Assets of Community Value and its role as our custodian of open space is despicable.    


Decisions as important as this need to be taken properly and got right, for Londoners now and for coming generations.” 


Bernadette Hillman, Head of Planning London, Shakespeare Martineau, acting on behalf of Jenny O'Neill said:  


“Take a second look at the project, beyond the hype, designs and CGI visuals, and it is clear that this project remains shrouded in legal complexities that need serious rigour applying to them by way of a thorough review. 


The groundswell of public support, coupled with the insight given by multiple experts associated with this project, are testament to the fact that this project needs a clear and comprehensive audit that can lay bare the ongoing uncertainties surrounding the proposal.  In particular the funding gaps and role of private and public sources, the restrictions over private use, constraints on public access, the status with Lambeth and Westminster councils, not to mention the physical and urban repercussions this will have at either end of the bridge.  
We are asking the court to quash the decision and to send the project back to Lambeth Council for much more careful consideration.  This needs to happen before significant changes are made and actions that have been based on inaccurate information and insight become irreparable.”  

 

Notes:


1. The Evening Standard’s ongoing poll has had nearly 4,500 respondents, 61% against the Garden Bridge. 13,000 people have signed petitions against the bridge which have been submitted to Lambeth Council.  
(http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/sadiq-khan-cancelling-garden-bridge-would-now-cost-taxpayer-twice-asmuch-as-building-it-a3256251.html)

2. The Garden Bridge was granted planning permission in December 2014 by Lambeth and Westminster Councils, subject to 46 planning conditions, including agreeing a s106 legal agreement with both local authorities which would include a guarantee from an appropriate body to underwrite the £3.1m annual running costs of the bridge. Whilst Mayor of London Boris Johnson agreed to provide such a guarantee in June 2015, subject to details to be agreed, but the guarantee has never been finalised and remains outstanding. Other approvals are still required from the Port of London Authority and the Maritime Marine Organisation. There remains a funding gap of £33m on the £175m construction costs.  

 

3. The land on which the Garden Bridge would arrive at the South Bank was opened by the Queen in 1988 and belongs to Lambeth Council, with a long lease to Coin Street Community Builders to maintain it as public open space free from commercial activity. On 24th March 2016 Lambeth Council entered into negotiations with Coin Street Community Builders and the Garden Bridge Trust to vary the lease to enable a 68m X 17m South Landing building to be constructed on the site. The building would contain stairs and lifts plus 8 toilets for the expected 7 million visitors annually, as well 410m2 of commercial space. Lambeth Council and Coin Street Community Builders propose to share the windfall income profit from this element of the bridge.

 

4. Ms O’Neill is crowdfunding the action at www.everyclick.com/tcos   

 

 

Please reload

CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE GARDEN BRIDGE

We are dedicated to saving public space on the South Bank and over the River Thames. The controversial Garden Bridge is not needed here, it would destroy protected views and is democratically and environmentally damaging. Help us stop this now.

RECENT POSTS
Please reload

VIEW POSTS BY MONTH
Please reload

PRESS ARTICLES

CLICK ON THE LINKS BELOW

 

12/6/19 Garden Bridge failure should be likened to Kids Company scandal, MPs told

17/3/19 Minister: it’s ‘unfortunate’ we spent £43m on Garden Bridge

13/2/19 Garden bridge charity spent £53.5m with no construction, TfL finds

12/12/18 Garden Bridge Trust claims £5m of public money for wind-up costs

31/7/18 Garden Bridge backers 'may have breached legal duties'

31/7/18 Garden Bridge trustees may have ‘breached their legal duties’ says QC

01/03/18 Boris Johnson defends garden bridge plan that will cost public £46m

01/03/18 Boris Johnson blames Garden Bridge project blunders on successor

28/02/18 Boris Johnson could face investigation over Thames garden bridge

14/8/17 London's Garden Bridge project officially abandoned

14/8/17 London's Garden Bridge project scrapped

6/7/17 Soothing the Garden Bridge’s troubled waters

22/6/17 Standards commissioner examines complaint against Garden Bridge review

11/5/17 Good riddance to the Garden Bridge: an eye-watering waste of public funds by Walter Menteth

29/4/17 Lumley fights on for her fabulous bridge

 

28/4/17 The garden bridge is dead – now £37m of public money must be repaid

 

28/4/17 Garden Bridge: London mayor Sadiq Khan withdraws support

 

16/4/17 Garden bridge project is a landmark of the post-truth era

15/4/17 A garden bridge to nowhere

7/4/17 Garden Bridge should be scrapped, Hodge review finds

 

27/3/17 Garden Bridge could cost £22 million more than forecast

10/3/17 MP warns mayor over Garden Bridge’s cost to taxpayer

 

28/2/17 Garden Bridge Trust cleared of financial irregularities

23/2/17 Top criminal QC raises ‘serious concerns’ over Garden Bridge contest

9/2/17 London garden bridge case weaker now than in 2014, says Treasury official

8/2/17 Garden Bridge: all-party pressure on Sadiq not to sign guarantee

15/1/17 Let’s not be led any further up the garden bridge

 

11/01/17 London garden bridge project's future is in doubt, say trustees

5/01/17 "If 2016 was the Year of Bullshit, then the Garden Bridge could be its monument”

27/12/16 Garden bridge charity warns more delays could terminate project

16/12/16 MPs investigating Garden Bridge question need for scheme

14/12/16 Letter from PAC chair Meg Hillier to  Treasury Permanent Secretary

9/11/16 TCOS response to the GBT's misleading autumn newsletter

16/10/16 Controversial garden bridge to cost public total of £50m – even if it fails to go ahead

11/10/16 Mayor must refuse to sign the Garden Bridge maintenance guarantee: statement on NAO report

11/10/16 David Cameron 'ignored civil servants over Garden Bridge funding'

11/10/16 Department for Transport ignored official advice not to risk public money on Garden Bridge

22/9/16 London’s garden bridge would benefit only the rich

22/9/16 Dame Margaret Hodge MP to conduct review into Garden Bridge project

7/9/16 Garden Bridge Adjournment Debate in the House of Commons led by Kate Hoey MP

17/8/16 £22m gap in Garden Bridge funds - Newsnight investigation

 

5/8/16 Thames garden bridge delays raise risk of major boat collision – expert

29/7/16 Garden bridge charity delays publishing annual accounts for five months

 

25/7/16 Garden Bridge: Tough questions for £175m Thames project

24/7/16 HS2 and the garden bridge are vanity projects – it's not too late to scrap both

21/7/16 Garden bridge may need taxpayer bailout once built, report says

11/7/16 Sadiq Halts Work On Garden Bridge

30/6/16 National Audit Office investigates London garden bridge grant

 

19/5/16 London's garden bridge: visitors urged to donate on Thames crossing

21/4/16 Boris Johnson accused of misleading politicians over garden bridge

 

17/4/16 Why did Sadiq Khan change his mind over the Garden Bridge? He's fallen for the sunk costs fallacy

14/4/16 Council consultation row over Garden Bridge

 

5/4/16 Lambeth’s Garden Bridge decision to face scrutiny

 

1/4/16 Joanna Lumley proposes Thames ‘Allotment Ferry’

 

1/4/16 Giant Boris Gnome planned for Garden Bridge

 

24/3/16 Architects and critics in last-minute plea to stop Garden Bridge

 

21/3/16 The Garden Bridge project reeks of cronyism and improper process. And here are the other 25 problems with it

 

18/3/16 London's Boris Johnson 'chided' over Garden Bridge design contract

 

9/3/16 Toilets and terrorism: Lambeth approves Garden Bridge plans 

 

7/3/16:  Garden Bridge: London council allegedly threatened over Thames project - by Peter Walker

 

7/3/16 Taking the piss out on the Garden Bridge - by George Turner

 

6/3/16 Thames garden bridge faces last-ditch challenge from local politicians - by Peter Walker
 

3/3/16 Lambeth could take Garden Bridge decision behiind closed doors - by James Hatts

 

1/3/16 Caroline Pidgeon pledges total opposition to the Garden Bridge - by Caroline Pidgeon

 

February 2016 ‘Thames Garden Bridge Procurement issues’ Walter Menteth, Project Compass CIC.

24/2/16 "On Bullshit" & the Garden Bridge - by Dan Anderson

 

14/2/16 Garden bridge: a project promoted and sold with half‑truths, deceptions and evasions - by Rowan Moore.

 

14/2/16 You've had your fun - let's put the Garden Bridge to bed now - by Rachel Holdsworth

 

13/2/16 Why is London's Garden Bridge worth as much as five Lancashire museums? Ask Joanna Lumley - by Ian Jack

 

12/2/16 London's Garden Bridge is exposing the messy business of architecture competitions - by Diana Budds

 

10/2/16 London Green party call halt to privatisation of public space in London - by Sian Berry

 

10/2/16 Is it still possible to stop the Garden Bridge? - by Will Wiles.

 

9/2/16 Garden Bridge procurement statement from RIBA - Jane Duncan

 

31/1/16 Muddy Waters - Jobs for the boys - by Walter Menteth

29/1/16 The Garden Bridge subverts the lessons of history - by Dan Anderson

 

20/1/16 Boris Johnson evades Tom Copley AM's questions about the Garden Bridge

 

20/1/16 Londoners' money put at risk by the Garden Bridge  - by Will  Hurst

 

17/1/16 George Osborne under attack overGarden Bridge cash pledge - by Mark Townsend

 

21/11/15 Why we must stop Thomas Heatherwick's Garden Bridge - by Jack Wakefield

 

17 Sept 2015. GLA Oversight Committee Agenda Item 8, p71-72. Walter Menteth Report submission to the GLA Oversight Committee to inform their examination into the procurement of the design and technical services for the Thames Garden Bridge. Document review, analysis, report & response to GLA questions by Walter Menteth of Project Compass CIC as expert witness on behalf of industry. 34p.